Flu sucks
Wednesday, March 19, 2008
If you tried contacting me in the last few days, I was deeply offline due to high fever. Not fully recovered yet. Flu be damned!
Popularity: 11% [?]
If you tried contacting me in the last few days, I was deeply offline due to high fever. Not fully recovered yet. Flu be damned!
Popularity: 11% [?]
In reply to: Daniel
In Russia it is common to create pronounceable words from abbreviates and use those ‘crippled’ names instead in the spoken language, so “BMW” (the car brand) is not “Bee eM doubleU”, but a much more pronounceable “Beemer” or even “Boomer”.
Brought to you by “The more you know” (picture a rainbow). ![]()
Popularity: 12% [?]
When morning light is just a reminder that you forgot to go to sleep …
Popularity: 13% [?]
On homosexuality
Listening to some recordings of the Howard Stern show got me thinking about homosexuality. I try not to have any prejudices, so I tried to view this phenomenon from a purely logical point of view with as little external data as possible, so help me if I’m wrong.
Close relationships between two persons are generally understood to contain four separate components: sex, legal matters, social matters and romantic matters.
First of all it is said that, while the percentage of homosexual people is low, many heterosexual people have had some kind of homosexual experience either as an experimentation or as an accidental exposure. It also is believed that if the person in question is not physiologically repulsed by the concept (i.e. homofobic) then they can experience sexual pleasure regardless of the gender of the partner, number of partners or even absence of such. In all we can basically conclude that while homofobia is a sexual disorder (it disorders sexual function), homosexuality is not about sex at all.
The legal perspective is very inconclusive - in some parts of the world even having homosexual relationships can be illegal, but in other parts of the world homosexual marriages are not uncommon. Also all the legal stuff is there to help people that can not help themselves, especially minorities. So the legal part should be all for the equalising homosexuality to heterosexuality unless that does direct and irreparable harm to the society (which it seemingly does not).
From social perspective homosexual couples look to be living the life very similar to the heterosexual couples - there are some that are going wild and there are some that honour strong and stable relationships for decades and love to go to theatre. It could even seem that homosexual people tend to have a higher percentage of creative people and intellectuals.
The only think left is love. Call it a quick romantic encounter or a the love of the lifetime, but that seems to be the major descriptive difference with homosexually oriented people - they just fall in love with types of people that tend to be of same gender as themselves. It could be related to behavioural predispositions or differences in hormonal perception, but ultimately we do not know enough about love to fully understand that difference.
So at this point I can only conclude that until we understand all the hormonal processes and that “love” thingy, we could just as well start counting homosexual males and homosexual females as two additional genders that can not be fully understood by other two genders, just like men can not fully understand women and the other way around. This difference is as real and as effective as the difference between male and female genders or (stretching the analogy a bit too far) like the difference between races and should be honoured just as much as these differences are honoured.
And now I coin the terms “omale” and “ofmale” as the new homosexual male and female gender descriptors and “oman”, “omen”, “owman” and “owmen” as terms for single homosexual male, multiple homosexual males, single homosexual female and multiple homosexual females respectively.
Popularity: 8% [?]
Catching up with unread blogs - Nat Friedmans blog has two very interesting entries: one huge entry about parties (with lots of photos) and another about parkour featuring a bunch of Latvian-Russian guys from the second larges city of Latvia - Daugavpils, which is ~50 kilometres away from the place of my birth. The video has several scenes from the very centre of the city. While on that topic I must say that I have also done some soft parkour when I was ~10 years old - not like it was popular in the day, I was just naturally good with climbing, jumping and balancing on strange places.
Also note: It is possible to watch Google Video videos without Flash plugin - view the source of the video page, copy the first parameter that is passed to the Flash plugin (the one that starts with “http”), decode that with something like Python’s urllib.unquote() and then pass to wget or even directly to totem. I didn’t get sound from the stream, but as I also can gen no sound from Flash, I am not complaining.
Popularity: 7% [?]