<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Azureus killing a small router?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aigarius.com/blog/2008/05/11/azureus-killing-a-small-router/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aigarius.com/blog/2008/05/11/azureus-killing-a-small-router/</link>
	<description>Mindblogging the world to itself</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rivotril.</title>
		<link>http://www.aigarius.com/blog/2008/05/11/azureus-killing-a-small-router/#comment-198305</link>
		<dc:creator>Rivotril.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 08:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aigarius.com/blog/2008/05/11/azureus-killing-a-small-router/#comment-198305</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Rivotril....&lt;/strong&gt;

Buy rivotril mexico. Rivotril mexico....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rivotril&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Buy rivotril mexico. Rivotril mexico&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://www.aigarius.com/blog/2008/05/11/azureus-killing-a-small-router/#comment-163488</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 20:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aigarius.com/blog/2008/05/11/azureus-killing-a-small-router/#comment-163488</guid>
		<description>Does anybody have any solution?
I have max 75 connections in Azureus and DHT switched off....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anybody have any solution?<br />
I have max 75 connections in Azureus and DHT switched off&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elkin</title>
		<link>http://www.aigarius.com/blog/2008/05/11/azureus-killing-a-small-router/#comment-134825</link>
		<dc:creator>Elkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 08:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aigarius.com/blog/2008/05/11/azureus-killing-a-small-router/#comment-134825</guid>
		<description>I just bought a new ADSL modem after leaving Azureus runing all night long and finding my trusty Devolo Modem fried in the morning. I even had it limited to about 150 connections... but still killed it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just bought a new ADSL modem after leaving Azureus runing all night long and finding my trusty Devolo Modem fried in the morning. I even had it limited to about 150 connections&#8230; but still killed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lloeki</title>
		<link>http://www.aigarius.com/blog/2008/05/11/azureus-killing-a-small-router/#comment-134318</link>
		<dc:creator>lloeki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 19:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aigarius.com/blog/2008/05/11/azureus-killing-a-small-router/#comment-134318</guid>
		<description>i'm hitting a similar issue, but it does not kill my router (WRT54Gv5+ddwrt), it just saturates the router in some way. if azureus runs for more that two minutes, another computer cannot get a dhcp lease, or even associate to the wifi AP. as soon as I kill azureus, the other one connects successfully to the network. what's weird is that azureus is transmitting at ridiculous rates (1~2kib/s) when this occurs. this does not occur with, say, deluge. my solution, ditch the damn azureus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m hitting a similar issue, but it does not kill my router (WRT54Gv5+ddwrt), it just saturates the router in some way. if azureus runs for more that two minutes, another computer cannot get a dhcp lease, or even associate to the wifi AP. as soon as I kill azureus, the other one connects successfully to the network. what&#8217;s weird is that azureus is transmitting at ridiculous rates (1~2kib/s) when this occurs. this does not occur with, say, deluge. my solution, ditch the damn azureus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.aigarius.com/blog/2008/05/11/azureus-killing-a-small-router/#comment-133594</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 04:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aigarius.com/blog/2008/05/11/azureus-killing-a-small-router/#comment-133594</guid>
		<description>I had similar problems with the joke hardware my phone company tried to pass off as a router. It used a different chipset but exibited the same problems. I believe that the problem is caused by multiple connections at once. Azureus and Steams' [www.steampowered.com] launcher program also rebooted it. But what made it worse was the TV was going through this router too. So every time the router rebooted the TV went off!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had similar problems with the joke hardware my phone company tried to pass off as a router. It used a different chipset but exibited the same problems. I believe that the problem is caused by multiple connections at once. Azureus and Steams&#8217; [www.steampowered.com] launcher program also rebooted it. But what made it worse was the TV was going through this router too. So every time the router rebooted the TV went off!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew W. S. Bell</title>
		<link>http://www.aigarius.com/blog/2008/05/11/azureus-killing-a-small-router/#comment-133361</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew W. S. Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 20:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aigarius.com/blog/2008/05/11/azureus-killing-a-small-router/#comment-133361</guid>
		<description>With the netfilter/iptables default settings I find that it is quite easy to entirely fill the connection tracking table. There are quite a lot pages on this on the web.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the netfilter/iptables default settings I find that it is quite easy to entirely fill the connection tracking table. There are quite a lot pages on this on the web.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.aigarius.com/blog/2008/05/11/azureus-killing-a-small-router/#comment-133192</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 14:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aigarius.com/blog/2008/05/11/azureus-killing-a-small-router/#comment-133192</guid>
		<description>It's quite common, I've seen similar behavior with friend's ADSL modem (we had to switch it to bridge and make NAT on the computer).
DHT + connections are quite efficient stress-test for these cheap boxes. Try lowering connection timeout in router to relieve conntrack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s quite common, I&#8217;ve seen similar behavior with friend&#8217;s ADSL modem (we had to switch it to bridge and make NAT on the computer).<br />
DHT + connections are quite efficient stress-test for these cheap boxes. Try lowering connection timeout in router to relieve conntrack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
